Risk of obsolescence: Technology advancements have led to the large-scale adoption of online payments, paperless applications, and electronic records.They are also more suitable for small businesses and retailers with lower transaction volumes and less costly transactions. In other words, single checks are most suitable for frequent travelers or individuals constantly on the move. Convenience: As small checks are lighter than duplicate checks, their mobility and convenience quotient is higher.However, the same is not applicable for duplicate checks, as you have to exert reasonably heavy writing pressure to ensure that the backup copy is clear and unambiguous. Writing pressure: You do not have to exert much pressure while writing a single check as there is no carbon copy beneath it.Consequently, you may procure duplicate checks more frequently, thereby leading to a further rise in check purchase costs. Hence, you may exhaust your duplicate checks faster. Moreover, checks are usually sold by the box and the number of duplicate checks per box is lower than that of single checks per box. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |